The case illustrates that even for very serious sexual offences against children (significantly above mid-range seriousness), the youth of the offender and the crushing effect of a lengthy total sentence on rehabilitation prospects may require a reduction in sentence. The court confirmed that but for the applicant's youth, the sentences would not have been found excessive. The case also provides a useful survey of comparable sentences for offences under ss 66A and 66B of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW).
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.