Sv v WA

[2013] WASCA 208

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal
3. › Appeal against conviction
4. › Conviction on plea of guilty
5. › Whether plea should be set aside
6. › Whether miscarriage of justice established
7. › Whether appellant understood nature of charge
8. › Whether plea obtained by improper inducement
9. › Whether plea motivated by prospect of lenient sentence
10. › Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA), s 101(1)(b)
11. › Criminal Appeals Act 2004 (WA), s 27
1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal
3. › Additional evidence on appeal
4. › Application to admit additional evidence
5. › Whether evidence could arguably establish foundation to set aside convictions
6. › Criminal Appeals Act 2004 (WA), s 40(1)(e)

Quick Take

The case confirms the application of the three recognised categories for setting aside guilty pleas in Western Australia, and reaffirms that a plea entered in the hope of a more lenient sentence does not, without more, constitute a miscarriage of justice. An appellant's uncertainty about whether counsel properly explained a legal concept is insufficient to establish miscarriage of justice where the record shows the concept was the subject of charge negotiations conducted on the appellant's instructions.