A contract has one legal meaning, and an appellate court is not confined to asking whether the primary judge's construction was merely 'available'; however, considerable regard will be paid to the primary judge's reasoning, and where construction involves findings of primary fact, conventional appellate deference applies. The meaning of 'similar' in a restrictive covenant is determined qualitatively by reference to the distinctive elements of the defined concept, not by generic similarities common to many businesses.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.