In Muldrock re-sentencing cases, evidence of post-offence compliance with prison discipline and willingness to participate in rehabilitation programs does not justify a lesser sentence where the offender does not express remorse or accept responsibility for offending. The standard non-parole period remains a significant guidepost where offending is at or above mid-range and there is little operating in the offender's favour, but it must not be given determinative significance. There is no hierarchy of seriousness for forms of sexual intercourse under s 66A(1).
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.