Parhizkar v R

[2014] NSWCCA 240

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › procedure
3. › whether trial judge erred in not allowing cross-examination of a witness as to whether he had viewed footage of the events on the internet.
1. Criminal Law
2. › procedure
3. › juries
4. › whether trial judge erred in not discharging the jury following publication of a prejudicial article
5. › whether trial judge erred in failing to give the jury access to transcripts of counsels’ addresses and the judge’s summing up.
1. Criminal Law
2. › appeal against sentence
3. › greater restrictions involved in immigration detention while awaiting trial
4. › whether trial judge should have accounted for this in sentencing
5. › whether trial judge was aware of the nature of the applicant’s detention while awaiting trial

Citation[2014] NSWCCA 240

CourtNSWCCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in