Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

The Queen v Vanko [2014] NTSC 3 — Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

The Queen v Vanko

[2014] NTSC 3

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Practice and procedure
3. › Indictment
4. › Severance
5. › Offences founded on similar facts
6. › Evidence cross-admissible
7. › Series of offences of similar character
8. › Prosecution of a single purpose
9. › Application refused
10. › Criminal Code (NT) s 309, s 339, s 341
1. Sutton v The Queen [1984] HCA 5; (1984) 152 CLR 528; KRM v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 231, referred to.

Case Details

Citation[2014] NTSC 3

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2020The Queen v FaustmannNTSC 8
2016R v Daniel William DrummondNTSC 19

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works