An eight-year delay in seeking leave to appeal against a murder conviction, prompted by advice from fellow prisoners, is insufficient to warrant an extension of time where the applicant provides no satisfactory explanation for the delay and the proposed grounds of appeal lack merit. An applicant is bound by the forensic decisions of trial counsel, including the decision to implicate a specific alternative suspect, which renders irrelevant complaints about failure to investigate other suspects.
The full text is available to signed-in members.