R v Ti (No. 2)

[2015] ACTSC 208

Supreme Court of the ACT16 June 2015

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Evidence
2. › Admissibility and Relevance
3. › complainant in
1. Singapore and unwilling to return to Australia to give evidence
1. evidence could be taken by audiovisual link from Singapore
2. › whether Crown
1. had taken all reasonable steps to secure

Citation[2015] ACTSC 208

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date16 June 2015

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in