R v Woutersz [2017] ACTSC 212 — Evidence & Admissibility And Relevance — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Woutersz
[2017] ACTSC 212
Supreme Court of the ACT
11 August 2017
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+4 more
Evidence
Admissibility and Relevance
Witnesses
expert witness in Canada and unwilling to return to Australia to give evidence
Case Details
Citation
[2017] ACTSC 212
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
11 August 2017
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] ACTSC 212
7 authorities it relies on
1992
1997
2002
2007
2012
2017
Relies on
7
2015
R v Ti (No. 2)
ACTSC 208
2014
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pirovic Enterprises Pty Ltd
FCA 544
2012
Kirby v Centro Properties Limited
FCA 60
2004
The Bell Group Ltd (In Liquidation) & Anor v Westpac Banking Corporation & Anor (4)
WASC 162
and 3 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
