Glare v R

[2015] NSWCCA 194

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Aggregate sentences
4. › Indicative sentences
5. › Requirement to record indicative sentences reflecting discount for plea of guilty
6. › Whether error to apply discount only to aggregate total
7. › Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 53A(2)(b)
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Parity
4. › Co-offenders sentenced for same offences
5. › Whether disparity in sentences warranted lesser sentence on re-sentencing
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Aggravated break enter and steal
4. › Objective seriousness
5. › Guideline judgment factors
6. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 112(2), 113(2)

Quick Take

When imposing an aggregate sentence under s 53A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), the discount for plea of guilty and assistance must be applied to each individual indicative sentence, not to the aggregate total. Failure to do so constitutes sentencing error.

Case Details

Citation[2015] NSWCCA 194

CourtNSWCCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.

3 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by12

2023Chu v RNSWCCA 13
2022Ts v RNSWCCA 222
2022Gl v RNSWCCA 202
2022Moananu v RNSWCCA 85
and 8 more after sign-in

Relies on13

2015R v CahillNSWCCA 53
2014R v MJBNSWCCA 195
2014Jm v RNSWCCA 297
2014Behman v ReginaNSWCCA 239
and 9 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in