› were the current claims precluded because an earlier claim was rejected by opinion of a Minister that, inter alia, the land in one of the present claims was needed or likely to be needed as residential lands
ABORIGINAL LAND RIGHTS - claim to Crown lands
› were the claims precluded because the land was needed or likely to be needed for an essential public purpose
› meaning of “essential public purpose”
› although residential development capable of being a public purpose, it was not an “essential” one
Case Details
Citation[2015] NSWLEC 179
CourtNSWLEC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.