The Court of Appeal refused a recusal application by an unrepresented appellant, holding that a judge's prior involvement in referring papers to the Attorney-General for consideration of a vexatious proceedings order did not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias in subsequent proceedings involving the same litigant. The court applied its own earlier reasoning in Tey v Optima Financial Group Pty Ltd [2012] WASCA 192 on the same issue.
The full text is available to signed-in members.