Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Cowie v Gungahlin Veterinary Services Pty Ltd [2016] ACTSC 311 — Costs — Barrister AI

Cowie v Gungahlin Veterinary Services Pty Ltd

[2016] ACTSC 311

Supreme Court of the ACT25 October 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › COSTS
3. › Cross-appeal costs
4. › Appeal by way of rehearing from Magistrates Court
5. › Calderbank offer
6. › Whether offer must explain the reasons for making the offer
7. › Magistrate’s reasons inadequate
8. › Re-exercise of discretion
9. › Offer made well prior to service of important expert evidence
10. › Unreasonableness of non-acceptance of offer not established
11. › Cross-appeal dismissed

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 311

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date25 October 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by8

2026Schmidt v The King (Cth)SASC 101
2024Harlovich v SebbensACTSC 153
2022Kinnane v BeattieACTSC 265
2020Murray v IAACTSC 288
and 4 more after sign-in

Relies on20

2015Patrick Stevedores Operations (No 2) Pty Ltd v Hennessy; FBIS International Protective Services (Aust) Pty Ltd v HennessyNSWCA 253
2014Urbaniak-Bak v PrailACTSC 171
2011Thornton v SweeneyNSWCA 244
2009Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak; Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Bou NajemHCA 48
and 16 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works