Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Murray v IA [2020] ACTSC 288 — Appeal & Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm — Barrister AI

Murray v IA

[2020] ACTSC 288

Supreme Court of the ACT12 October 2020

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › APPEAL
3. › Appeal from the Magistrates
1. Court against sentence
2. › assault occasioning actual bodily harm
1. respondent assaulted her son
2. › magistrate made a non‑conviction
1. order with a good behaviour order
2. › whether the

Case Details

Citation[2020] ACTSC 288

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date12 October 2020

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.

2 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by7

2026Schmidt v The King (Cth)SASC 101
2024DPP v Krutsky (No 2)ACTSC 120
2022R v Porter (No 3)ACTSC 236
2022R v Kayin (a pseudonym)ACTSC 164
and 3 more after sign-in

Relies on14

2020ZL v CoreyACTSC 143
2019R v Nicholas; R v PalmerACTCA 36
2019Williams v ConnorACTSC 184
2016Cowie v Gungahlin Veterinary Services Pty LtdACTSC 311
and 10 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works