R v Bi (No 3)

[2016] ACTSC 356

Supreme Court of the ACT

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Trial by jury
4. › historical sexual offences
5. › multiple offences
6. › multiple complainants
7. › multiple charges
8. › act of indecency against a person aged 16 years or below
9. › sexual intercourse with a person aged 16 years or below
10. › incest
1. Evidence
2. › JUDICIAL DISCRETION TO ADMIT OR EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
3. › Witnesses
4. › admissibility of evidence
5. › credibility evidence
6. › advance ruling and findings
1. cross-examination by defence as to credibility of the witness
2. › witness previously convicted for the offence of obtaining money by deception
3. › could substantially affect the assessment of the witness’s credibility
4. › degree of dishonesty a relevant factor for consideration
5. › proposed cross-examination not inconsistent with the intention of s 103
6. › substantial probative value
7. › objection to the cross-examination of the dishonesty conviction over-ruled
8. › s 103 of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
1. Evidence
2. › EVIDENTIARY MATTERS RELATING TO WITNESSES AND ACCUSED PERSONS
3. › Privilege in relation to self-incrimination
4. › s 128 certificate issued by the Court
5. › s 128 of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)

Citation[2016] ACTSC 356

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in