Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Bishop v Houlahan; Bishop v Lawrence [2016] ACTSC 384 — Appeal And New Trial — Barrister AI

Bishop v Houlahan; Bishop v Lawrence

[2016] ACTSC 384

Supreme Court of the ACT23 December 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL
3. › Appeal
4. › General Principles
5. › offence of driving with a level four concentration of alcohol in breath as a repeat offender
6. › purported appeal from default disqualification period operative under s 33 of the Road Transport (Alcohol and Drugs) Act
7. › appeal incompetent
8. › effect of incompetence on stay of disqualification under s 216 of the Magistrates Court Act.
1. Criminal Law
2. › APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL
3. › appeal from convictions and sentences imposed by Magistrate
4. › pleas of guilty entered to one offence each of failing to leave a licensed premises and hindering a public official and three offences of resisting a public official
5. › whether appellant denied procedural fairness in relation to sentencing proceedings
6. › appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 384

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date23 December 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2018Beath v McCurleyACTCA 48

Relies on3

2015Burow v QueenACTCA 61
2012Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings LtdHCA 55
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works