Post-Muldrock, a sentencing judge's assessment that an offence is 'below the mid-range of objective seriousness' is sufficiently specific and need not indicate the precise extent to which the offence falls below mid-range. Where indicative head sentences in an aggregate sentence produce fractional mathematical starting points when discounts are reversed, this does not establish error if the starting points can be inferred and the fractional results are explained by rounding down in the offender's favour.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.