Section 6(2)(b) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2005 (Qld) does not constrain the court to prohibiting proceedings only against persons who have already been subjected to vexatious proceedings by the respondent. An appellant challenging the scope of a vexatious proceedings prohibition order must identify a specific error of the kind described in House v The King; merely contending that a narrower order would be 'more appropriate' is insufficient.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.