The case confirms that proceedings characterised by unjustifiable damages claims, unsupported conspiracy allegations, scandalous assertions without factual basis, disorganised pleadings, likely statute-barred claims, and repetition of earlier claims are properly classified as vexatious under the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2005 (Qld). A litigant's disability does not excuse fundamental pleading deficiencies or render otherwise vexatious proceedings non-vexatious. Part 8 of the UCPR does not apply to applications under the VPA.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.