Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Arnesto v Hickman [2016] TASSC 26 — Appeal And Review — Barrister AI

Arnesto v Hickman

[2016] TASSC 26

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Magistrates
2. › Appeal and review
3. › Tasmania
4. › Motion to review
5. › Other matters
6. › Fail to state name and address
7. › Error of law
8. › Meaning of requirement
9. › Police officer must convey legal obligation to provide details and reason for the obligation.
1. Police Offences Act 1935 (Tas), s 55A.
1. Aust Dig Magistrates [1349]

Case Details

Citation[2016] TASSC 26

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2025Baker v SmithTASSC 43
2022McLean v WilkieTASSC 13
2019Schafer v Commissioner of PoliceQCA 292

Relies on13

2009Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory RevenueHCA 41
2008R J E v Secretary to the Department of JusticeVSCA 265
2006Police v Conway; Police v ParkerSASC 186
2005Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer EntertainmentHCA 58
and 9 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works