Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Impedovo v Nolan (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 146 — Appeal & Supreme Court Procedure — Barrister AI

Impedovo v Nolan (No 2)

[2017] ACTSC 146

Supreme Court of the ACT26 June 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal and New Trial
2. › APPEAL
3. › GENERAL PRINCIPLES
4. › Enforcement of debt
5. › seizure and sale order in place in favour of judgment creditors
6. › application by the judgment creditors to amend existing seizure and sale order
7. › whether costs can be added to existing order
1. Procedure
2. › Supreme Court procedure
3. › Court’s power to amend seizure and sale orders - Court’s inherent power to dispense with the rules of procedure

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 146

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date26 June 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2017Impedovo v Nolan (No 3)ACTSC 232

Relies on1

2016Impedovo v NolanACTSC 386

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works