Impedovo v Nolan (No 3)

[2017] ACTSC 232

Supreme Court of the ACT20 December 2016

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Procedure
2. › ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS
3. › Seizure and sale
4. › money order
5. › judgment of a Magistrates Court in another jurisdiction registered in the Supreme Court
6. › service of the enforcement order
7. › in chambers orders
8. › Application in Proceedings was entitled between enforcement officer and the enforcement debtor
1. Real Property
2. › SEIZURE AND SALE OF LAND
3. › Failure to pay judgment debt justified a sale of real property
4. › sale must be at a fair and reasonable price
5. › r 2219 of the Court Procedure Rules 2006 (ACT)

Citation[2017] ACTSC 232

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date20 December 2016

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in