R v Etj

[2017] ACTSC 27

Supreme Court of the ACT24 February 2017

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Particular Offences
3. › offences against the person
4. › act of indecency with a young person
5. › indecent assault.
1. Evidence
2. › Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
3. › application to admit tendency evidence
4. › significant probative value
5. › special features
6. › unsupported evidence by the complainant
7. › potential prejudice
8. › application is refused.
1. Evidence
2. › Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
3. › application to admit relationship or context evidence
4. › to explain charged act was not an isolated incident
5. › application allowed.

Citation[2017] ACTSC 27

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date24 February 2017

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in