Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Alas (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 333 — Evidence — Barrister AI

R v Alas (No 2)

[2017] ACTSC 333

Supreme Court of the ACT7 November 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
1. Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
1. Evidence of sexual activities of the complainant
1. application to admit evidence only admissible with leave of the Court

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 333

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date7 November 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by11

2024DPP v Lodding (No 2)ACTSC 32
2024DPP v PittACTSC 338
2024DPP v PatersonACTSC 313
2023DPP v KnACTSC 243
and 7 more after sign-in

Relies on3

2017R v AlasACTSC 272
2014R v St (No 2)ACTSC 52
2006W v RTASSC 52

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works