Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Alas [2017] ACTSC 272 — Criminal Law & Evidence — Barrister AI

R v Alas

[2017] ACTSC 272

Supreme Court of the ACT18 September 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
1. Evidence
1. Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
1. application to adduce tendency evidence

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 272

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date18 September 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2017R v Alas (No 2)ACTSC 333

Relies on6

2017Hughes v The QueenHCA 20
2016R v CxACTSC 106
2016IMM v The QueenHCA 14
2014Elomar v R; Hasan v R; Cheikho v R; Cheikho v R; Jamal v RNSWCCA 303
and 2 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works