In a short trial where the sole issue is the complainant's credibility and the summing up follows closely after the defence address, the trial judge is not obliged to summarise or reiterate the defence submissions; the requirement to put the defence case fairly is context-dependent and does not require advocacy for a weak defence. Where defence counsel opens that the accused will give evidence but the accused subsequently elects not to, the standard directions as to onus of proof and right to silence are ordinarily sufficient to address any prejudice, and the better forensic course may be to sidestep the issue rather than seek a discharge or specific direction.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.