› where inappropriate for issues in proceedings to be determined by separate courts - where issues in dispute include whether there was a partnership or a joint venture and whether or not there was a de facto relationship between the alleged joint-venture parties
› strong inter-relationship of issues.
Civil Procedure
› Jurisdiction
› Transfers to and from other courts
› where Supreme Court and Family Court of Australia have jurisdiction to determine issues in proceedings
› consideration of jurisdiction conferred as described in Jensen v Pearce [2013] NSWCA 247
› whether proceedings should be transferred to Family Court of Australia pursuant to Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act, s 5(1)(b).
Case Details
Citation[2017] NSWSC 1643
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
