Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

The Queen v DA [2017] NTSC 2 — Barrister AI

The Queen v DA

[2017] NTSC 2

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Code (NT) s 192, s 192(3), s 213, s 213(1), s 213(4), s 213(5)
1. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2013 (NT) s 138
1. Youth Justice Act 2005 (NT) s 15, s 29, s 32, s 59
1. Fernando v Commissioner of Police (1995) 78 A Crim R 64; King v R (1996) 24 MVR 543; R v Stillman [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607; referred to.

Case Details

Citation[2017] NTSC 2

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2017The Queen v TANTSC 46

Relies on5

2015Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v ZhaoHCA 5
2014Lee v The Queen; Lee v The QueenHCA 20
2013Lee v New South Wales Crime CommissionHCA 39
2013X7 v Australian Crime CommissionHCA 29
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works