The Queen v TA [2017] NTSC 46 — Sexual Intercourse Without Consent — Barrister AI
← Back
The Queen v TA
[2017] NTSC 46
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Evidence
›
Sexual intercourse without consent
›
admissibility of DNA evidence
›
DNA evidence obtained in contravention of s 29 of the Youth Justice Act
›
failure to provide a support person during intimate forensic procedure
›
whether to exercise discretion to admit evidence
›
evidence had significant probative value
›
admission of evidence did not unduly prejudice the rights of the defendant
›
DNA evidence admissible
›
Youth Justice Act (NT) s 29, s 59.
Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act (NT) s 138(1)
Youth Justice Act (NT) s 29, s 59
R v Helmhout (2001) 125 A Crim R 257; [2001] NSWCCA 372; Tasmania v Seabourne [2010] TASSC 35; The Queen v DA [2017] NTSC 2, referred to.
Case Details
Citation
[2017] NTSC 46
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] NTSC 46
3 authorities it relies on
2001
2004
2007
2010
2013
2017
Relies on
3
2017
The Queen v DA
NTSC 2
2010
Tasmania v Seabourne
TASSC 35
2001
R v Helmhout
NSWCCA 372
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
