Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Lo v Nta & Ors [2017] NTSC 24 — Costs & Repugnancy Of Delegated Legislation — Barrister AI

Lo v Nta & Ors

[2017] NTSC 24

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Costs
3. › Costs in respect of a settlement conference held pursuant to Rule 48.12
4. › Usual position is that costs are costs of the proceedings
5. › Circumstances by which a party may be liable for costs of a settlement conference
6. › Requirement to establish that a party refused to participate in the settlement conference
7. › Meaning of refusing to participate.
1. Statutory Interpretation
2. › Repugnancy of delegated legislation
3. › Inconsistency between rules of Court and subsequently enacted statute
4. › Whether rules invalid to the extent of the inconsistency
5. › Test to be applied to determine inconsistency
6. › Whether statute intended to be a complete statement of law
7. › whether rules invalid to the extent of the inconsistency.
1. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act (NT), s 131(1), (2)
1. Supreme Court Act (NT)>, s 86(2)

Case Details

Citation[2017] NTSC 24

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2019James v North Star Pastoral Pty Ltd (Costs of Settlement Conference)NTSC 74
2017Ceccon Transport Pty Ltd & Ors v Tomazos Group Pty Ltd (No 2)NTSC 55

Relies on14

2010Forsyth v Sinclair (No 2)VSCA 195
2009Pinot Nominees Pty Ltd v Commissioner of TaxationFCA 1508
2007Azzi and Ors v Volvo Car Australia Pty Ltd (Costs)NSWSC 375
2004The Silver Fox Company Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Baker Family Trust (ACN 083 629 225) v Lenard’s Pty Ltd (ACN 010 711 145) (No 3)FCA 1570
and 10 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works