› Supreme Court Procedure - Practice Direction No. 6 of 2009
› Defendant’s failure to comply with Practice Direction No. 6 of 2009 caused delay and unnecessary costs to be incurred by plaintiffs and prevented proper consideration of an appropriate resolution of the proceedings
› Defendants ordered to pay costs on an indemnity basis
Civil Law
› PROCEDURE
› Discovery - Failure to give proper discovery prolonged the dispute
› Conduct falls far short of the conduct expected of a litigant properly advised in relation to the seriousness of complying with the obligation to give discovery
› Indemnity costs may be allowed
Civil Law - Procedure
› COSTS
› Calderbank settlement offer made by plaintiffs - Judgment less favourable to defendants than Calderbank offer
› Refusal of offer was unreasonable
Interest
› Interest on costs
› Whether a higher interest rate should be imposed where there is failure to comply with Practice Direction No. 6 of 2009
Case Details
Citation[2017] NTSC 55
CourtNTSC
JurisdictionNorthern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.