Wurramarba v Langdon

[2017] NTSC 5

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Evidence
2. › IDENTIFICATION
3. › Appeal against conviction
4. › driving whilst disqualified
5. › reliability of identification evidence of a sole prosecution witness
6. › ‘recognition evidence’
7. › whether magistrate failed to direct herself appropriately in accordance with s 116 and s 165 Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act (NT)
8. › partial compliance with the requirements of s 165(2)(b) and s 116(1)(b)
9. › error of law
10. › no substantial miscarriage of justice
11. › proviso applied
12. › appeal dismissed.
1. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act s 116, s 165
1. Local Court (Criminal Procedure) Act s 177
1. Trudgett v R [2008] NSWCCA 62; (2007) 70 NSWLR 696; Carr v The Queen [2000] TASSC 183; (2000) 117 A Crim R 272; Clarke v The Queen (1997) 97 A Crim R 414; M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487; Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30; (2007) 230 CLR 559; Reg v Turnbull [1977] QB 224; Carr v The Queen [2000] TASSC 183; (2000) 117 A Crim R 272, applied.

Citation[2017] NTSC 5

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in