A party's failure to object to an opponent's departure from its pleaded case does not constitute consent to any further departures at any stage, including after judgment. Applications to re-open after judgment has been delivered with conclusive findings face an even higher threshold than applications made after judgment is reserved but before reasons are published. The evident explanation that the amount produced by the existing methodology is not to the applicant's liking is not a satisfactory explanation for the lateness of an application to re-open.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.