Evidence from family members denying they told the accused something is capable of establishing that the accused's statement to police attributing information to the family was untrue, even where not all family members were asked the specific question. Presumptive blood testing evidence is admissible where the witness explains the limitations of the testing, including the possibility of false positives, and does not assert the presence of blood as a definitive finding.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.