The Court of Appeal struck out a purported appeal from a prior decision dismissing the appellant's appeal, where the appellant's sole contention was that the prior judge erred by not distinguishing between hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions of the parties' names and by failing to apply 'canonical law' or 'the law of the Roman Curia'. Fraser JA held the submissions made no legal sense and could not justify review. A restricted filing order was imposed preventing the appellant from filing further documents relating to the underlying proceeding without leave of the Court or a Judge of Appeal.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.