Sutcliffe v Brown [2017] TASSC 51 — Appeal And Review & Aust Dig Magistrates [1349] — Barrister AI
← Back
Sutcliffe v Brown
[2017] TASSC 51
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Magistrates
›
Appeal and review
›
Tasmania
›
Motion to review
›
Other matters
›
Sentencing
›
Sentence manifestly excessive or inadequate
›
Driving with blood alcohol content exceeding .05, injury to property, and other offences
›
Deliberate collisions with partner's car
›
Time in custody on related matters overlooked
›
Sentence of four months' imprisonment with three months suspended manifestly excessive.
Geale v Tasmania [2009] TASSC 28, 18 Tas R 338, referred to.
Aust Dig Magistrates [1349]
Case Details
Citation
[2017] TASSC 51
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] TASSC 51
7 authorities it relies on
1936
1952
1968
1984
2000
2017
Relies on
7
2010
Robinson v Chatters
TASSC 66
2009
Phillips v Arnold
TASSC 43
2009
Geale v Tasmania
TASSC 28
2006
James v Turner
TASSC 54
and 3 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
