The case confirms that allegations of dissipation of judgment funds through gambling require more than evidence of ATM withdrawals at venues with gambling facilities; a plausible alternative explanation for the withdrawals and evidence of a frugal lifestyle will defeat a stay application. Bank statements showing withdrawals of approximately $110 per week at social venues in a rural area were held to provide very weak evidence of gambling.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.