Circumstantial evidence of drug dealing activity combined with direct evidence from an accomplice that the accused had authority to access and did access drugs stored in a metal box in the accused's bedroom was sufficient to sustain a conviction for joint possession with intent to sell or supply, notwithstanding the accomplice's admission that she owned the drugs. Non-disclosure of a police conversation with a witness about the availability of a s 11 Evidence Act certificate does not constitute a miscarriage of justice where there is no reasonable possibility that the knowledge would have changed defence counsel's cross-examination or forensic strategy in any material respect.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.