Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Agius v SA (No 6) [2018] FCA 358 — Native Title & Consent Determination — Barrister AI

Agius v SA (No 6)

[2018] FCA 358

Federal Court of Australia

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Native Title
1. consent determination
1. whether requirements of s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) satisfied
1. requirements for negative determination

Case Details

Citation[2018] FCA 358

CourtFCA

JurisdictionCommonwealth

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 25 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 25 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by25

2026Kemp Attrill v State of South AustraliaFCA 1431
2026Vos, on behalf of the Tjalkadjara Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia (No 2)FCA 1343
2026Kum Sing on behalf of the Mitakoodi and Mayi People #5 v State of Queensland (No 4)FCA 118
2025Muir on behalf of the Payarri People v State of Western AustraliaFCA 1456
and 21 more after sign-in

Relies on26

2018Weribone on behalf of the Mandandanji People v State of QueenslandFCA 247
2017Sumner v State of South Australia (Ngarrindjeri Native Title Claim Part A)FCA 1514
2017Yaegl People #2 v Attorney General of New South WalesFCA 993
2017Western Bundjalung People v Attorney General of New South WalesFCA 992
and 22 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works