Rogic v Samaan

[2018] NSWSC 1464

Supreme Court of NSW

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. ESTOPPEL by conduct
2. › General principles
3. › Claim by ex-husband that he did not seek property settlement in 1992 in reliance on deceased’s representation that she would leave him the matrimonial home to which he had allegedly contributed to mortgage repayments
4. › Plaintiff’s evidence including conversations with deceased not capable of corroboration and insufficient to establish claim
1. Succession
2. › Family provision and maintenance
3. › evidence
4. › Claim by ex-husband
5. › Application to extend time
6. › Whether factors warranting
7. › Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 59(1)(b)
1. Evidence
2. › Affidavit evidence
3. › Non-English speaking witness
4. › How affidavit to be prepared
5. › Bilingual legal representative not to perform role of interpreter
6. › Judicial Council on Cultural Diversity, “Recommended National Standards for Working with Interpreters in Courts and Tribunals”

Citation[2018] NSWSC 1464

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in