In unsuccessful or withdrawn applications for admission as a legal practitioner, the costs discretion should be exercised to order a fixed amount less than full indemnity, having regard to the court's supervisory role, the asymmetry of costs risk (the LPAB is not exposed to adverse costs orders absent misconduct), the non-punitive nature of a refusal of admission, and the LPAB's status as a non-party litigant performing a statutory function. The court also questioned the appropriateness of the LPAB briefing Queen's Counsel on candour issues in admission proceedings.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.