The factors listed in R v Tran as potentially justifying a 'double benefit' (early plea, youth, genuine remorse, rehabilitation steps) are illustrative, not exhaustive. Additional factors such as significant cooperation with authorities or reduced culpability due to coercion may also be relevant. The existence of some Tran factors does not mandate a double benefit; the sentencing judge retains a broad discretion to balance all relevant considerations.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.