The comparatively low number of child pornography images accessed or possessed does not preclude a substantial sentence where the offender has prior convictions for similar offending, reoffended shortly after parole expired, and completed a sex offenders rehabilitation program without effect. In such circumstances, specific deterrence may more than offset the mitigating effect of a low image count. An offender sentenced as a serious sexual offender under s 6D of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) faces protection of the community as the principal sentencing purpose.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.