Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Mathews [2019] ACTSC 262 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Mathews

[2019] ACTSC 262

Supreme Court of the ACT20 September 2019

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and Punishment
4. › Sentence
5. › possession of prohibited substance for the purposes of sale or supply
6. › possession of a drug of dependence
7. › driving a motor with prescribed drug in blood
8. › where assessed as unsuitable for an intensive corrections order
9. › whether an intensive corrections order should nevertheless be made
10. › section 29(1)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT)

Case Details

Citation[2019] ACTSC 262

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date20 September 2019

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2025R v Hancock (No 5); DPP v HancockACTSC 31
2020R v MathewsACTSC 364

Relies on12

2016Zdravkovic v The QueenACTCA 53
2016R v Ngerengere (No 3)ACTSC 299
2016R v IngramACTSC 199
2015R v Elphick (No 2)ACTSC 23
and 8 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works