Jamal v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)

• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › Jurisdictional error
  4. › District Court exercising criminal appellate jurisdiction
  5. › Whether failure to conduct rehearing constituted jurisdictional error
  6. › Whether errors of fact or law constituted jurisdictional error
  7. › Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69
  8. › District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176
• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › Procedural fairness
  4. › District Court appeal
  5. › Whether denial of procedural fairness in conduct of hearing
  6. › Whether failure to respond to substantial arguments
  7. › Whether refusal to receive evidence
• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › Bias
  4. › Apprehended bias
  5. › Actual bias
  6. › Whether fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend bias
  7. › Whether judge prejudged the case
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal
  3. › Appeal from Local Court to District Court
  4. › Appeal by way of rehearing
  5. › Whether appellant required to demonstrate error by magistrate
  6. › Standard of proof on rehearing
  7. › Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 11, 17, 18

Quick Take