The case confirms that the assessment of objective seriousness of an indecent assault offence is a question of fact reviewable only on House v The King principles. Form 1 offences are not relevant to the assessment of objective seriousness of the principal offence but may be taken into account by giving greater weight to personal deterrence and retribution. Sentencing judges are not required by procedural fairness to alert counsel that the weight given to remorse may be affected by the offender's failure to give evidence. The primary consideration for the utilitarian guilty plea discount is the timing of the plea, and the utilitarian value is usually diminished by delay caused by plea negotiations.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.