Mixed verdicts of guilty and not guilty on different counts of a multi-count sexual offence indictment are consistent with a jury adopting a cautious approach and do not necessarily indicate inconsistency, particularly where the evidence supporting each count varies in quality and detail. Tendency evidence from other complainants can provide the 'something additional' that enables a jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt on counts where the complainant's credibility is challenged. A trial judge's critical comments about a complainant's credibility in the summing up do not bind the appellate court and are not to be given weight in the unreasonable verdict assessment where the matters commented upon are apparent from the transcript.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.