The removal of children from an offender's care, where the offender was obviously dangerous to those children, does not constitute extra-curial punishment and cannot be taken into account in mitigation of sentence. The vulnerability of a child to offending by her parent is a distinct aggravating factor from the child's chronological age and the parent's abuse of a position of authority, and taking it into account does not involve double counting even where age or authority is an element of the offence. A sentence is not perfected until entered on the indictment signed by the judge, and correction of errors before that point does not constitute an impermissible increase in sentence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.