Where the Crown case on an element of the offence (particularly intent) rests substantially on circumstantial evidence and a reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence is open on the evidence, the trial judge must direct the jury that guilt must be the only rational inference from the proven circumstances. Failure to give such directions, even absent an application for re-directions, may render the summing up inadequate and result in a miscarriage of justice requiring a retrial.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.