Johnson v SA

[2019] SADC 35

District Court of South Australia

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. [47]
1. I think what's important is not your knowledge but it was your understanding at the time. I gather from your last answer that you didn't realise a piece of paper was sufficient. At the time, what was your understanding of what was required of a driver to comply.
1. So you mean stated orally.
1. Yes.

Citation[2019] SADC 35

CourtSADC

JurisdictionSouth Australia

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in